Vidhara

The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

§86Parties not consenting discharged by qualified or limited acceptance

If the holder of a bill of exchange acquiesces in a qualified acceptance, or one limited to part of the sum mentioned in the bill, or which substitutes a different place or time for payment, or which, where the drawees are not partners, is not signed by all the drawees, all previous parties whose consent is not obtained to such acceptance are discharged as against the holder and those claiming under him, unless on notice given by the holder they assent to such acceptance. Explanation.—An acceptance is qualified (a) where it is conditional, declaring the payment to be dependent on the happening of an event therein stated; (b) where it undertakes the payment of part only of the sum ordered to be paid; Subs. by Act 12 of 1921, s. 2, for “twenty-four”. (c) where no place of payment being specified on the order, it undertakes the payment at a specified place, and not otherwise or elsewhere; or where, a place of payment being specified in the order, it undertakes the payment at some other place and not otherwise or elsewhere; (d) where it undertakes the payment at a time other than that at which under the order it would be legally due.

Share:WhatsAppTelegram

Source & version

Official text: India Code (official)

Official India Code text: The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (26 of 1881), English PDF (bitstream 123456789/15327/1/negotiable_instruments_act,_1881.pdf, 681,124 bytes, sha256 50fe22a1…) fetched directly from indiacode.nic.in (Akamai edge, DNS via dns.google) on 2026-07-29. Extracted via pdftotext 26.07 -bbox and @nexlex/ingest gazette parser. Automated parse; footnotes/amendment history excluded; spot-verified (s. 138 cheque dishonour); full clause-level proofread pending.

How we verify this text →

Spotted a mistake in this text or its mapping? Report an issue with NI §86

Was this page useful for your prep?

Feedback